In a case involving an authorship dispute and potential misconduct, Journal X faced a situation where the corresponding author (author A) removed the name of the last author (author B) from two accepted manuscripts during the galley proof stage. Subsequently, author A requested to replace author B with a suitable acknowledgment, citing a personal dispute that had arisen between the two authors after manuscript submission.
Read more: Resolution of Authorship Dispute and Misconduct in Manuscript Submission
In a recent case involving alleged plagiarism, Journal A took prompt action upon receiving a complaint from an author of a paper published four years ago in Journal B. The complainant pointed out substantial similarities between his work and a review paper published in Journal A about a year ago. Although the author of the paper in Journal A had referenced the complainant's article for a specific point, the nearly identical sections were not appropriately acknowledged.
Conducting successful research hinges on meticulous planning and execution, with the choice of the right research methodology playing a pivotal role. This decision, though challenging and sometimes perplexing, lays the foundation for the entire research process, dictating the approaches and methods employed for data collection.
Read more: Navigating the Maze: A Guide to Choosing the Best Research Methodology for Your Study
Scientific Route OÜ opens doors for authors seeking a unique opportunity to publish their monographs in the European Union. Our services cater to both collective and individual works, with the added advantage of potential Scopus indexing. We understand the importance of making your research widely accessible and offer competitive pricing with discounts of up to 50%.
Read more: Exclusive discounts from Scientific Route OÜ for publishing monographs in the EU
The editorial occasionally come across a situation when an author withdraws a manuscript upon receiving a payment request. The editorial considers this irresponsible, when much of the publication process has been completed by editors and reviewers. The editorial request authors to provide payment details after the manuscript has been accepted for publication. The fees policy is published on our website and we require that the author confirms that they have has read the journal policies prior submitting the manuscript.
The Editor-in-Chief of a journal received a message from a corresponding author of a brief communication, stating that the proposed editorial edits were beyond typical formatting edits at this stage. They felt said many edits were not appropriate, would need further response and suggested holding this article (which had already been in process with the journal for over a year) for the next editor-in-chief when they are appointed.
Read more: AUTHOR REFUSES TO COMPLY WITH EDITORIAL REVIEW PRIOR TO PRODUCTION AND PUBLICATION
In the realm of effective communication, the judicious use of synonyms can be a game-changer. Discover why integrating synonyms into your speech or writing is not just beneficial but also crucial for elevating both your oral and written skills.
Read more: Enhancing Communication Skills with Effective Synonym Usage
Keywords play a pivotal role in connecting researchers to relevant articles and determining an article's visibility. Crafting effective keywords involves strategic planning, with the title serving as a cornerstone. This article explores how researchers can strategically select keywords, offering insights into incorporating them throughout the document. Additionally, it introduces tools that aid in keyword selection, enhancing the discoverability of research articles.
Read more: Navigating Effective Keyword Selection: Tools and Strategies
Journal A received a submission which focused on a systematic review/meta-analysis of a health problem in a specific country. It was written by four authors who do not live in that country. In addition, none of the authors seem to have any professional affiliation with any institution or researchers in that country. The systematic review/meta-analysis was based on published references and did not include primary data collection and analyses.
Read more: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON A COUNTRY’S HEALTH PROBLEM WRITTEN BY NON-NATIVE AUTHORS








































































































![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x723x274-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.HW7uSdT1rb.png)









































































































































































































































































































































































































































































![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x119x130-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.wrYLO_DTxU.jpg)










































































































































































































































































































































































































































