A manuscript submitted through our electronic system underwent standard journal procedures until a surprising revelation surfaced. Originally authored by one individual, the revised version suddenly bore the names of two authors, with one matching a reviewer. This discovery prompted an immediate halt to the review process.
Upon investigation, the original author confirmed the reviewer's unexpected co-authorship, citing assistance in grammar, logic, references, and shared expertise in experimental methods. This revelation sparked further scrutiny, leading the editor-in-chief to commission an independent review, resulting in a recommendation for rejection.
The editor sought clarification from the reviewer regarding their involvement and perspective. While it's plausible the reviewer's contributions warranted authorship, the matter necessitates careful consideration. Pending resolution, the manuscript remains subject to review based on its scientific merit.