![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x723x274-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.HW7uSdT1rb.png)
![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x119x130-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.wrYLO_DTxU.jpg)
A complex authorship dispute unfolded at Journal X, involving authors A and B, prompting intervention from editors and publishers. Initially, author A unilaterally removed author B's name from two accepted manuscripts, citing personal conflicts. Despite author A's request for exclusion, editors reinstated author B based on original authorship agreements.
Read more: Authorship Dispute Resolved Amidst Ethical Concerns
Scientific Route OÜ Publishing House (Estonia) invites researchers to publish monographs and collective monographs indexed by Scopus
Read more: FAVORABLE CONDITIONS FOR PUBLISHING A MONOGRAPH WITH SCOPUS INDEXING
A disconcerting case of potential serial misconduct has emerged in the realm of academic publishing, shedding light on ethical lapses and authorship disputes that threaten the integrity of scientific research.
The case came to light when a reviewer alerted the editor to a paper submitted without the approval of at least one coauthor, a claim corroborated by additional authors. Despite the first author's assertion of informed consent from all coauthors, the editor requested written confirmation, signaling a commitment to upholding ethical standards.
Read more: Investigation Unveils Potential Serial Misconduct in Research Authorship and Ethics
In a recent incident, the editors of our journal were confronted with a plagiarism case just before the final step in the volume publication process. The author of the paper in question had already paid the publication fee and completed and signed the publication agreement, affirming the originality of the paper.
Read more: Plagiarism and Publication Fee: Editorial Response
A manuscript submitted through our electronic system underwent standard journal procedures until a surprising revelation surfaced. Originally authored by one individual, the revised version suddenly bore the names of two authors, with one matching a reviewer. This discovery prompted an immediate halt to the review process.
Read more: Controversy Arises: Reviewer Co-Authors Manuscript After Suspected Contact
In the ever-changing landscape of academic publishing, scholars often inquire about the possibility of publishing monographs, particularly with a view to securing inclusion in prestigious databases such as Scopus. This article delves into the intricacies of this process, emphasizing the crucial role of publishers in determining the fate of a monograph in terms of reprinting and potential indexing.
Imagine seeing your monograph indexed by Scopus and reaching a wider audience with your scholarly work.
Read more: Maximize Your Research Potential: Explore Our Exclusive Package Offer
Recent developments have brought to light concerns regarding the similarity between two published papers, Paper X in Journal A and Paper Y in Journal B. Approximately a month after the publication of Paper X, readers alerted Journal A to the striking resemblance between the two papers. Despite some superficial differences, both papers share highly similar results and conclusions, with significant overlap in authorship.
Read more: Notice of Concern Regarding Similarity Between Published Papers
Scientific Route OÜ, a distinguished publishing house, invites submissions of chapters for collective monographs and monographs. Notably, publications by Scientific Route OÜ are indexed in Scopus, enhancing their visibility and impact.
Read more: Call for Manuscripts for Collective Monographs Indexed in Scopus