Scientific Route OÜ, Estonia-based publisher, offers a platform for monograph manuscripts across diverse subjects. Here's what you need to know:
- Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ (Estonia) - Visit our website here.
- Accessibility: All monographs are publicly available in the catalog, with copyright retained by authors.
- Global Collaboration: We value international collaboration, offering a loyalty program for scientists from various countries.
- Special Conditions: Avail unique discounts through our fee reduction policy.
Transparency is our ethos:
- Catalog: Explore our diverse range of monographs in the catalog.
- Pricing: Review our pricing policy for monographs here.
- Indexing Databases: We ensure visibility by indexing in renowned databases, including Scopus (details here).
Ready to publish? Submit your material via "Make a Submission" here or reach out to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for inquiries. Join us in disseminating cutting-edge research globally!
Read more: Publish Your Monograph with Scientific Route OÜ: Scopus Indexing Available!
You're invited to be a part of a groundbreaking collective monograph, "Transformations of National Economies Under Conditions of Instability", slated for publication in 2024 by Scientific Route OÜ. With only four spots remaining for potential authors, seize the opportunity to leave your mark on this influential publication.
The Editorial Office of our journal faces a critical decision regarding a paper published in 2022. Concerns have been raised about its similarity to the authors' prior work from 2019, prompting an internal audit and a reevaluation of the peer-review process.
Read more: Contemplating Retraction: Assessing Similarity in Published Papers
In a recent incident, concerns have arisen over a potential breach of confidentiality by a reviewer involved in the peer review process of a scientific article. The authors of the article accused the reviewer of identifying them based on a figure presented at a conference while the paper was still under review, raising questions about ethical conduct in the academic community.
Read more: Controversial Reviewer Behavior Unveiled in Academic Journal Submission
The journal has been approached by the sole author of an already accepted article, requesting the addition of a second author. The original author claims to have forgotten to include the co-author earlier. However, the journal is understandably concerned about the potential for the new author to receive undue credit if their name is added without merit.
Read more: Handling the Late Addition of a New Author to an Article
Journal A recently faced allegations of potential plagiarism when a complaint was lodged three years after the publication of an original article. The complaint pointed to striking similarities between the introduction of Journal A's article and a case report published in Journal B, raising questions about intellectual property and publishing ethics.
Read more: Plagiarism Concerns Arise as Journals Navigate Copyright and Ethical Dilemmas
Title: “TRANSFORMATIONS OF NATIONAL ECONOMIES UNDER CONDITIONS OF INSTABILITY”!
- Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ (Estonia)
- Indexing: Scopus, Google Scholar, Zenodo, Digar and others.
- Bonus for authors from Ukraine: Authors from Ukraine will receive a nice bonus in the form of a 50% discount on publication.
Read more about the discount here.
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Phone: +37258501673, (representative office in Ukraine +380684918172)
Do not miss the opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge and make a significant contribution to modern scientific thought!
An incident of redundant publication has led to the rejection of a manuscript, highlighting the importance of transparency and ethical conduct in academic publishing.
Read more: Manuscript Rejected Due to Redundant Publication: Authors Apologize
A recent incident has brought to light the challenge of dealing with misrepresentation of journal decisions on social media platforms. An author, upon receiving a decision of 'major revision' for their submitted paper, opted to withdraw the article instead of revising it, citing disagreements with the reviewers. Subsequently, the author posted the paper on various websites, accompanied by commentary naming the journal and editor and falsely claiming that the paper was rejected by reviewers, rather than being asked for major revisions.
Read more: Addressing Misrepresentation of Journal Decision on Social Media










































![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x723x274-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.HW7uSdT1rb.png)


















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x119x130-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.wrYLO_DTxU.jpg)































































































































































































































































































































































