![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x723x274-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.HW7uSdT1rb.png)
![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x119x130-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.wrYLO_DTxU.jpg)
- Monographs are published in open access.
- Copyright is reserved by the authors.
- The language of publication is English.
- A unique 50% discount is available for authors from Ukraine.
More information about the discount here.
Read more: Sections of collective monographs published by Scientific Route OÜ with Scopus indexing
In a cautionary tale highlighting the perils of predatory publishing, an author found themselves entangled in a web of deceit after unwittingly submitting a review article to a predatory journal, Journal X. What began as an innocuous response to an invitation for an invited review quickly turned into a nightmare of unexpected invoices and a glaring absence of peer review.
Read more: Navigating Withdrawal from Predatory Journals: A Case Study in Scholarly Integrity
A recent dispute has surfaced regarding alleged plagiarism in academic literature, raising questions about authorship integrity and ethical standards in scholarly publishing.
Read more: Controversy Arises Over Alleged Plagiarism in Academic Publishing
In the realm of academic peer review, the concept of double-blind peer review stands as a cornerstone for impartial evaluation. In single-blind peer review, a common approach, authors remain unaware of the identities of the reviewers, while the reviewers possess knowledge of the authors' identities. Conversely, double-blind peer review introduces an additional layer of anonymity, where neither authors nor reviewers are privy to each other's names or affiliations.
Read more: Unraveling the Misconceptions Surrounding Double-Blind Peer Review
Upon conducting a routine check for redundant publications, the editors of our journal were alarmed to discover two strikingly similar articles authored by the same individual. Despite differences in disease focus, the abstracts exhibited significant overlap in wording, prompting further investigation.
A challenging scenario unfolds as the Editor-in-Chief of a journal encounters resistance from a corresponding author regarding proposed editorial edits to a brief communication. Despite the recommendation for acceptance with revisions by the section editor, the corresponding author contends that the suggested edits extend beyond typical formatting adjustments, advocating for postponing publication until the next editor-in-chief assumes office. Complicating matters further, the current Editor-in-Chief opts not to renew their contract amidst anonymous allegations regarding prolonged journal timelines.
Read more: Navigating Author Resistance to Editorial Review Prior to Publication
Title: "TRANSFORMATIONS OF NATIONAL ECONOMIES UNDER CONDITIONS OF INSTABILITY"!
Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ (Estonia)
Indexing: Scopus, Google Scholar, Zenodo, Digar and others.
For authors from Ukraine, there is a unique 50% discount.
Read more about the discount here.
Scopus blog reported that preprints have been added to Scopus Author Profiles as a content type to help you get an early view into the research focus of peers and potential collaborators. Preprints can be a helpful complement to peer-reviewed literature to gain insight into researcher endeavors.
Upon receiving an article for review, a journal was alerted by a referee to a potential case of duplicate publication. It was discovered that the submitted article mirrored content from a surgical journal article published eight years prior, which presented data on haemodynamics and intestinal blood flow in pigs.
Read more: Journal Contends with Potential Case of Duplicate Publication