![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x723x274-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.HW7uSdT1rb.png)
![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x119x130-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.wrYLO_DTxU.jpg)
A recent incident involving the misrepresentation of a journal decision on social media has sparked controversy within academic circles. Here's what happened:
An author submitted an invited paper to a journal and received a decision of 'major revision' following a double anonymous peer review. However, the author chose not to revise the paper, effectively withdrawing it due to disagreements with the reviewers. Subsequently, the author posted the article on personal and other websites, falsely claiming that it was rejected by reviewers, rather than being asked for major revisions.
Read more: Misrepresentation of Journal Decision on Social Media Sparks Controversy
In a recent case, a paper discussing a cohort of patients with an unusual respiratory pathogen was accepted and published in Journal A. However, the editor discovered a similar paper in a US journal, Journal B, published a few months earlier. The second paper featured more or less the same patients, with a few additions, and presented additional secondary outcome data, albeit reaching the same conclusions.
Read more: Editorial Dilemma: Navigating the Complex Terrain of Duplicate Publication
Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ (Estonia)
All monographs are in open access.
Indexing: Scopus, Google Scholar, Zenodo, Digar and others (indexing details)
Copyright is reserved by the authors.
Special conditions - 50% discount for scientists from Ukraine
Everything is transparent:
- Publisher's catalog
- Pricing policy
- Price reduction policy
- Current topics
Read more: Attention: A set of chapters for collective monographs with Scopus indexing!
The Editor-in-Chief of a prominent journal recently faced a challenging situation involving a corresponding author's refusal to comply with proposed editorial changes for their brief communication. The author expressed concern that the suggested edits extended beyond typical formatting adjustments and requested a delay in publication until the next Editor-in-Chief assumes the role.
Read more: Navigating Editorial Disagreements: A Case Study on Author-Editor Dynamics
If you have developments on this topic - show the Publisher for publication.
Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ (Estonia)
Indexing: Scopus, Google Scholar, Zenodo, Digar and others (indexing details)
A unique 50% discount is available for authors from Ukraine. More details here.
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Phone: +37258501673 (representative office in Ukraine +380684918172)
Scientific Route OÜ (Estonia) invites scientists to publish monographs indexed by Scopus.
All monographs are in the public domain.
Copyright remains with the authors.
There is a loyalty program for scientists from different countries and a package offer for scientists.
Special conditions - 50% discount for scientists from Ukraine
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Phone: +37258501673, (representative office in Ukraine +380684918172)
9 unique sections of important information,
9 different aspects of food technology,
9 promising solutions for the modern food industry.
READ and PUBLISH your monograph in Scientific Route OÜ, indexed by Scopus.
Check out the catalog of monographs, where you will find something that will be useful to you.
A recent paper published in a high-impact journal within the field of biological sciences (Journal A) has sparked controversy due to its heavy reliance on research previously published in lower-impact factor journals, notably Journal B, among others. Authors of the original research, including those whose work has been appropriated, have expressed concerns to the editor of Journal A, urging an investigation into the peer review process of the contentious paper.
Read more: Article Raises Concerns Over Potential Misappropriation of Research Across Journals
In a recent investigation, a concerning pattern of potential multiple publication of research studies has been uncovered across four different journals. Upon thorough examination, it was revealed that the author had replicated extensive sections of text, including tables, in all four articles.
Read more: Uncovering Multiple Instances of Redundant Publication in Academic Journals