The latest issue of the Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies has been released.
Read more: EEJET | Vol. 5 No. 11 (125) (2023) | Technology and Equipment of Food Production
WE RECOMMEND for you the XII scientific conference "Scientific results 2023" .
For 12 years, scientists have been summarizing their scientific activities with us and have the opportunity to test the results of their dissertation research. Archives of our conferences
The deadline for theses submission is until 10.12.2023 .
Presentation language : Ukrainian, English
Case
An article accepted for publication in a journal was recently deemed unpublishable. The authors have been covered in other journals for misinformation about the treatment of COVID-19. Another article, similar to the one the journal was about to publish, raised concerns in another publisher's journal. The editors reviewed the article in detail in their system and decided that peer review comments were not enough.
Read more: CANCELLATION OF THE DECISION AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF THE ARTICLE FOR PUBLICATION
The latest issue of the Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies has been released.
Case
An article was published with seven authors. B was thanked for his contribution. A year later, B wrote to the editor describing two alleged incidents related to this article. First, the cohort reported in the article was one that B was working on. He was looking to collaborate with another research group. A grant application was submitted and received.
The latest issue of the Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies has been released.
Read more: EEJET | Vol. 5 No. 9 (125) (2023) | Information and controlling system
Authors! WARNING!
Everything is ready, WE ARE WAITING ONLY FOR YOU!
Read more: THERE ARE FREE CHAPTERS IN COLLECTIVE MONOGRAPHS WITH SCOPUS INDEXING
The latest issue of the Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies has been released.
Read more: EEJET | Vol. 5 No. 8 (125) (2023) | Energy-saving technologies and equipment
Case
A letter was sent to the magazine with detailed information about the case. The authors were from Japan. After peer review and revision, the case report was accepted and acknowledgment was sent to the authors. Then two anonymous letters were received, both from Japan. Both letters claimed that the author "values honor above all else" and that he had provided "ridiculous data".